Next England manager unveiled, with legendary coach favored to succeed Thomas Tuchel following World Cup disappointment.
PEP GUARDIOLA is currently the leading candidate to take over as the next England manager.
The Three Lions faced World Cup disappointment in heartbreaking fashion in Atlanta.
Credit: Getty
Credit: PA
Anthony Gordon opened the scoring against Argentina, but England opted to sit back and absorb pressure.
Ultimately, they faltered as Enzo Fernandez equalized with a long-range shot in the 85th minute, followed by a dramatic injury-time header from Lautaro Martinez after a cross from Lionel Messi.
Betfair has now released the odds for a new manager to replace Thomas Tuchel.
Leading the pack is the former Manchester City manager.
READ MORE ON THE WORLD CUP
GOING UNDER
Fans express outrage, blaming Tuchel for ‘cowardly’ substitutions
WORLDIE OFFERS
World Cup 2026 free bets and offers: Discover the best new football sign-up deals
Guardiola, 55, is currently seeking new opportunities after his exit from the Etihad.
The Spaniard’s odds to take the England role stand at 5-2.
Next in line is Newcastle manager Eddie Howe at 10-3, followed by USA coach Mauricio Pochettino at 7-1.
Lee Carsley briefly served as interim manager after Gareth Southgate stepped down in 2024, and he has odds of 15-2 for the position.
WORLD CUP 2026 FREE BETS AND SIGN UP OFFERS

This positions him ahead of fellow Englishmen Graham Potter (11-1) and Frank Lampard (12-1), who are currently at the helms of Sweden and Coventry, respectively.
However, Tuchel’s departure isn’t anticipated after the World Cup setback.
The 52-year-old German recently signed a contract extension, binding him until the end of Euro 2028, during which England will co-host.
Tuchel faced significant backlash for his substitutions, opting to bring in several defenders in hopes of securing the game against Argentina.
Criticism arose from fans and analysts regarding the tactics that led to a neutralization of their earlier lead.
BBC analyst Wayne Rooney expressed his frustration: “We found ourselves in a promising position but didn’t know how to maintain it.
“We retreated and permitted them to press us, ultimately leading to our downfall. Once they scored the first goal, the second felt inevitable.
“When you’re on top, you need to stay aggressive. We went up 1-0, then shifted to a defensive formation. Allowing (Lionel) Messi and Argentina to have possession is inviting trouble.”
Credit: PA
Odds for Next England Manager
- Pep Guardiola 5-2
- Eddie Howe 10-3
- Mauricio Pochettino 7-1
- Lee Carsley 15-2
- Graham Potter 11-1
- Frank Lampard 12-1
Betfair
“These fans have invested significant amounts to be here. I expected more from this match.
“Argentina are the reigning champions; we recognized their quality.
“The changes we implemented did not produce benefits. It’s devastating. Luck often plays a vital role in winning tournaments.”
Alan Shearer added: “Thomas played his cards too early, believing England could hold on, and it backfired. Those decisions are often crucial.
“We appreciated his switch to a back five in previous games when under pressure.
“Now it’s valid to reflect: could he have shifted tactics and injected some pace? Everything returned to England after Argentina’s first goal.”
Shearer concluded on X: “The best team won. The changes left us lacking a clear offensive outlet. We had six defenders on with 25 minutes remaining. Frustrating.”
Despite the backlash, Tuchel stood by his choices.
He stated: “I had previously made offensive substitutions; we simply aimed to support the players.
“We conceded a chance almost immediately, and the decision to switch to a back five was made to tighten the gaps.
“They dominated aerial duels and kept delivering crosses, prompting the change to aim for defensive solidity. Once we took the lead, we allowed too many opportunities.
“Of course, the coach carries the burden of responsibility; if things go awry, it’s easy to criticize.
“Our intent was to go for a second goal, but I sensed that offensive changes wouldn’t yield the desired effect. We remained in our 4-4-2, but became increasingly passive.
“We couldn’t regain possession, which shifted the match dynamic entirely.
“I understand discussions are ongoing, and many coaches may think they have better strategies post-match.”
